Return to site

Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Tower system?

 If you've ever been through a city you might have noticed tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cellular providers to your phone. They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're less noticeable, they still can cause issues for users. The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the maximum amount of time an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic energy generated by wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data that show that RF energy could be harmful to human health. The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. It is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram calculated over one gram of tissue. But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies, it has the potential to cause greater energy intensity on the skin as well as other body parts. This can lead to a wide range of potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin conditions like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts. Due to the possible negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to create a general limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average across 1 centimeter, but not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz. The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe distance from the tower is at least 400 meters. This is because the transmitting power of the cell tower is significantly increased the further the tower is. Although this may sound like something that's good however, people who live close to towers might be more prone to health issues. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India discovered that people living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those who were far from antennas. This study showed that residents who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms improve within a few days. Studies have also demonstrated that exposure to extreme frequencies of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers, and other health problems. This is because RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand since the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection from pathogenic microorganisms, as well as infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body. https://zenwriting.net/snaildonna0/how-far-can-you-proceed-from-the-5g-portable-tower-without-staying-unsafe is accountable for keeping the integrity of the other organs. The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures of a short duration to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal penetration into the body (i.e. the heating of tissues). This assumption does not take into account the deeper penetration of the ELF components of modulated RF signals as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions do not correspond with the current understanding of biological consequences of RF radiation. As such they should not be used for health protective exposure standards. Additionally to that, ICNIRP and FCC restrict their exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the maximum speed of spatial absorption (psSAR), which can be described as not a reliable dosimetric instrument for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic effects. what is a safe distance from a cell tower could result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For safe distance from cell tower , co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could increase the risk of skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.

https://zenwriting.net/snaildonna0/how-far-can-you-proceed-from-the-5g-portable-tower-without-staying-unsafe|what is a safe distance from a cell tower|safe distance from cell tower